GGB is committed to providing updated news and analysis on our weekly news site, GGBNews.com.

Slippery Sovereignty

A look at the importance of sovereignty in these troubled times.

Slippery Sovereignty

One of the civics lessons we’ve learned during the Covid-19 pandemic is about how fleeting sovereignty can be. As we try to survive this desperate period, at times sovereignty has been used and abused in the battle against the coronavirus.

On an international scale, we’ve seen countries close their borders to either keep in or keep out sick people. And those that are allowed in are often required to quarantine for 14 days to ensure that they’re healthy and vital. Specific regions of individual countries have been quarantined, such as Wuhan, where the virus originated. But this was nothing new for China, where travel restrictions on its citizens are a daily aspect of that sovereignty.

Can you imagine that happening in the U.S.—say, in New York, which turned out to be the hotbed of viral infection in this country? Of course not. But that didn’t stop individual U.S. governors from instituting stay-at-home orders. States’ sovereignty was often cited as an excuse for this suspension of the inalienable rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.

To be sure, the Constitution limits the power of the federal government over states’ rights, so there supposedly is legal justification for governors to institute these restrictions. While the jury is still out on whether they’re actually working, the legal wrangling will probably take years to untangle.

Of course, there have been many suspensions of constitutional rights during wartime. The internment of Japanese-American citizens during World War II was one of the most egregious, but even the sainted Abraham Lincoln ran roughshod over constitutional rights during the Civil War.

Was the response to Covid-19 similar to those occurrences? Only time will tell.

Needless to add, sovereignty is the cornerstone of tribal gaming. Government-to-government relationships among tribal, state and federal governments are the bedrock principle when tribes decide what activities to offer on their reservation land. Tribes were under no obligation to close down their operations when the governors of their states ordered a lockdown. Yet they were often the first to voluntarily close their casinos, understanding that their role in the overall community is foremost. Their responsibilities to their members, employees and other stakeholders made it an easy decision.

Realistically, however, there was no choice. The states control access to tribal reservations, so any other decision would surely have forced a showdown between tribal and state authorities, which no one would have won. So the best course was to close down, with tribal sovereignty and community responsibility intact.

At the same time, during this period there were important developments related to tribal sovereignty that really had nothing to do with Covid-19.

In Massachusetts, the Mashpee Wampanoag tribe was stripped of its tribal sovereignty when the Department of the Interior decided to withdraw its approval of land into trust for a tribal reservation. The Mashpees are once again a landless tribe, as they have been for many years. In last month’s issue of GGB, attorney Judy Shapiro laid out the Mashpee struggle, and outlined why this is a dangerous precedent, not only for the Mashpees but for all of Indian Country.

For a quagmire of tribal sovereignty, you only need to look to Oklahoma. When the 20-year gaming compacts with the states’ tribes expired at the end of 2019, Governor Kevin Stitt declared that the compacts ended on December 31 and must be renegotiated. Tribes disagreed, saying the agreements automatically renewed. The result has been a continuing standoff.

In April, Stitt reached separate compact agreements with two tribes, giving them sports betting and the right to expand into territories that were not part of their reservations—a smart move by Stitt, because it broke the solid wall he had been facing against a unified tribal gaming industry. (Now the Oklahoma attorney general has ruled those new compacts null and void, because only the legislature can add new gaming options to a compact. But that doesn’t negate the governor’s purpose of dividing the tribes.) The Oklahoma Indian Gaming Association quickly suspended the tribes in question, saying the industry must speak with a united voice.

But where does this leave tribal sovereignty? If each tribe is indeed a separate nation, how can OIGA object when one government reaches an agreement with another?

As the leader of one of the rogue tribes, Otoe Missouria Chairman John R. Shotton, said, “Regardless of the opinion of the OIGA, there are not hierarchies of sovereign nations in Indian Country. I certainly hope as negotiations continue, other tribes won’t be singled out for exercising their tribal sovereignty.”

As we’ve commented many times during this ongoing crisis, we do live in interesting times.

Roger Gros is publisher of Global Gaming Business, the industry's leading gaming trade publication, and all its related publications. Prior to joining Global Gaming Business, Gros was president of Inlet Communications, an independent consulting firm. He was vice president of Casino Journal Publishing Group from 1984-2000, and held virtually every editorial title during his tenure. Gros was editor of Casino Journal, the National Gaming Summary and the Atlantic City Insider, and was the founding editor of Casino Player magazine. He was a co-founder of the American Gaming Summit and the Southern Gaming Summit conferences and trade shows. He is the author of the best-selling book, How to Win at Casino Gambling (Carlton Books, 1995), now in its fourth edition. Gros was named "Businessman of the Year" for 1998 by the Greater Atlantic City Chamber of Commerce, and received the Lifetime Achievement Award from the American Gaming Association in 2012.

    Related Articles

  • Being a Blockhead

    Regulators are going to have to come to terms with both cybercurrency and blockchain, and I’m glad I’m not the one who has to explain it to them.

  • Welcome to the Show

    With major organizations like Disney and the NFL joining the betting market, it's more important than ever to establish a responsible gaming community that aligns business and ethics.

  • Deck the Hall

    The American Gaming Association should consider several of these outstanding candidates for its annual Gaming Hall of Fame.

  • Smoke ‘Em If You Got ‘Em

    Would an industry-wide smoking ban in casinos have a negative impact on revenue? The benefits may outweigh the cost.

  • Brand Loyalty

    Exploring the importance of brand awareness for online casino operators.

    Recent Feature Articles

  • The Preacher

    For more than a decade, GAN’s Dermot Smurfit urged U.S. casinos to maximize their online presence, and now his company is at the forefront of B2B success in the North America

  • Dropping Demographics

    Initial visitation when casinos reopened during the pandemic skewed younger. Has that pattern continued?

  • 10 Trends for 2022

    As the industry continues to recover from the Covid-19 pandemic, leaders look forward to new revenue streams

  • Advertising: Consider Your Content & Volume

    All eyes are on gaming companies who want to establish their brands

  • California Sports Betting: The Battle Is Joined

    California gaming tribes have vowed to beat back several sports betting initiatives that could challenge their own proposal on the 2022 ballot.