GGB is committed to providing updated news and analysis on our weekly news site,

Paid Opportunities

In a survey of 3,000 U.S. college football fans, sports betting affiliate Covers posed the question of whether or not college football players should be paid a cash prize for winning bowl games, in light of the recent shifts with regard to transfer eligibility and name, image and likeness (NIL) deals.

The respondents were divided into two main categories of fandom, casual and diehard, and the classes were determined by the number of bowl games the respondent planned to watch over the course of the college bowl season—casuals planned to watch two or fewer, while diehards planned to watch three or more.

Overall, 56.5 percent of respondents indicated that players should be paid for bowl wins, with 43.5 percent voting against. Notably, diehard fans were more in favor of payment (57.4 percent) than their casual counterparts (51.7 percent).

Also included in the survey was the question of whether there should be more or fewer bowl games altogether—15.8 percent of diehards voted for more, compared to just 3.9 percent of casuals.

    Recent Feature Articles

  • A Good Bet

    As AGS prepares to return to private ownership, stock analysts and industry experts acknowledge that the company’s future is a good bet, private or public.

  • Taxing Problem

    Wagering tax hikes could shrink markets, have unintended consequences.

  • Cashless Crescendo

    The ongoing migration to a cashless casino experience.

  • Hold for Gold, Spin to Win

    Why hold-and-spin games have come to dominate the slot industry.

  • Ronnie Johns: A Life in the Hot Seat

    Following three years as chairman of the Louisiana Gaming Control Board and close to 40 years in public service, Ronnie Johns steps down.