Illinois Online Gambling Bill Fails

The Illinois legislature adjourned at the end of May, but Governor Bruce Rauner called lawmakers back to the capitol to try to pass a budget bill. The special session ended Friday, June 30 without a budget for the third consecutive year—and without an online gambling/daily fantasy sports bill. The House Executive Committee met during the week but took no action on either H 479, the iGaming/DFS bill, or on S 1531, a DFS-only bill.

The Illinois Senate had passed the iGaming/DFS bill 42-10 at the end of May.

DFS companies DraftKings and FanDuel operate in Illinois although a 2015 attorney general opinion stated DFS is illegal gambling. Online gambling is available through unregulated offshore websites. Supporters estimated the state could earn $1.7 billion through legal online gaming and $280 million in revenue in its first year of being legal, mainly from online casino games and poker.

In the Senate, the legislation was sponsored state Senators Kwame Raoul, Dave Syverson, Steve Stadelman, Pat McGuire and Napoleon Harris. H 479 was introduced in January and sponsored by state Rep. Michael Zalewski.

The bill would have created a Division of Internet Gaming within the Illinois Gaming Board. It would have issued five-year licenses costing $10 million each, and would have required an advance payment of taxes at 15 percent of revenue.

    Recent Feature Articles

  • Winning Culture

    AGS continues its rise in the slot market, building a strong “bench” to foster continued growth

  • What’s New in Restaurants?

    Emerging dining trends that can drive bottom line results for casino resort owner operators

  • Gambling in the Muslim World

    Why the Middle East and North Africa are often gaming-friendly

  • Eldorado, Caesars Agree to $17.3 Billion Merger

    The long-awaited merger between Caesars and Eldorado is a cash and stock mega-deal that will create the largest casino operator in the world, but for Eldorado it also carries a ton of debt

  • Apple Upsets the iGaming Cart

    Is it a consumer-protection measure or a monopolistic power play? Here’s how the technology giant is big-footing gaming operators.